Head-to-Head Win Rate Matrix vs Competitors
Win, tie, or lose every category prompt against each competitor. The Lumos head-to-head matrix, rendered on real prompts.
By Lumos Team ยท May 18, 2026
Want a real scan for your brand?
The example above is a static demo. Sign up to scan your brand: full results in 60 seconds, no credit card.
Get your scan: sign upWhy a matrix beats a leaderboard
A leaderboard says you are #3 in your category. It does not say who is #1, who is #2, what they win on, and where you flip from beating them to losing to them. That is the work. The Lumos head-to-head matrix is built to surface those flips โ the specific buyer prompts where competitive substitution happens.
In our own data, 78% of competitive prompts produce a clear win/loss verdict; the rest tie. Across 2,689 verdicts we have scored on customer brands, the median brand wins fewer than half of its category prompts against its biggest competitor. The bad news: most teams cannot tell which half. The good news: once you can see the matrix, the content roadmap writes itself.
What you see inside Lumos after signup
The preview above is Lumos's own head-to-head matrix, scored against our four most-mentioned GEO competitors (Profound, Peec AI, Otterly, Brandwatch) on six category prompts our buyers actually ask. After signup, the same surface runs with your competitor list and your prompts:
- Rows are buyer-intent prompts. Columns are competitors. Each cell is a verdict from the latest scan.
- Green = win (you are cited first, with positive framing). Red = loss. Gray = tie. White = not yet scored.
- Click any cell to open the raw AI answer that produced the verdict, the engine that returned it, and the cited sources.
- Filter by engine, time window, or buyer segment in the toolbar.
The matrix updates as the daily scan runs. A flip from win to loss triggers an alert if you have the notification add-on.
How Lumos scores a win
Per prompt, per engine, we parse the answer and look at three things in this order: which brand is cited first, in what context (recommendation vs comparison vs anti-recommendation), with what sentiment. A first citation with positive framing is a win. Last citation, comparison-only framing, or negative qualifier is a loss. Same rank, same framing is a tie. Aggregating across engines gives the per-prompt-per-competitor verdict you see in the matrix.
Common questions
What if my competitor is mentioned but I am not? That is a loss. Lumos does not soften the verdict with euphemisms.
Can I exclude prompts I do not care about? Yes. The matrix only shows the prompts you tracked. You define the slate; Lumos does the scoring.
Does the matrix include sentiment? Each cell carries a sentiment qualifier you can toggle on. For deeper language analysis, use Brand Sentiment Snapshot.
How often do verdicts flip? In our customer data, the median brand sees roughly 10โ15% of cells flip week-over-week โ enough that monthly check-ins miss the action.
Next steps
- Build your own matrix: sign up, pick four competitors, define six prompts.
- See your full visibility picture: Multi-LLM Brand Visibility Comparison.
- Auto-profile your competitors: Competitor Profile Builder.
- Read the strategy: GEO vs SEO and Why GEO is a competitive advantage.
2,689
head-to-head verdicts Lumos has scored across its customer base
Lumos platform data 2026
78%
of competitive prompts produce a clear win/loss verdict
Lumos platform data 2026
How it works
- 1
Read the demo matrix
Above is Lumos's own win/tie/loss matrix on real prompts against our four leading competitors.
- 2
Pick your competitors and prompts
Sign up, choose four competitors, and define the buyer-intent prompts you care about.
- 3
Investigate the losses first
Click any red cell. Lumos shows the raw AI answer, the sources, and the gap that flipped the verdict.
FAQ
How does Lumos decide a win?
For each prompt, the AI engine's answer is parsed to find which brand is cited first, in what context, and with what sentiment. The brand that lands at the top of the recommendation list, with positive framing, wins. Ties are when both appear at similar rank with similar framing.
Which competitors are in the matrix?
The matrix above is Lumos's own โ we score ourselves against the four leading GEO platforms: Profound, Peec AI, Otterly, and Brandwatch. Your matrix runs against the competitor list you choose.
How many prompts can I add?
Free accounts start with up to ten category prompts. Paid plans allow 100+, broken down by buyer segment, language, or product line.
Can the matrix track sentiment too?
Yes. Each cell carries both a verdict (win/tie/loss) and a sentiment qualifier. The Brand Sentiment Snapshot tool dives deeper into the language side.
Why is this better than ranking by engine alone?
A rank tells you you're #3. The matrix tells you who's #1, #2, and #4 โ and on which prompts you flip from win to loss. Competitive substitution lives in those flips, not in averages.
Related tools
Multi-LLM Brand Visibility Comparison
One dashboard, four engines. See ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity side by side, refreshed daily by Lumos.
Auto-Built Competitor Profiles for AI Search
Lumos auto-builds each competitor's AI profile: visibility score, cited sources, themes, and the fact gaps you can exploit.
Brand Mention Tracker in ChatGPT
Daily mention tracking for your brand inside ChatGPT. The Lumos ChatGPT slice โ score, trend, top prompts.
Related reading
Lumos vs Profound vs Peec AI: Which GEO Tool Fits Your Needs?
Objective comparison of three GEO platforms: Profound (enterprise, English), Peec AI (technical analytics), and Lumos (LATAM). Pricing, features, and use cases.
Lumos vs Meltwater vs Brandwatch: AI Comparison
Lumos vs Meltwater vs Brandwatch: focus, AI capabilities, data coverage, and pricing. Find out when to choose each tool for your brand.
The Best GEO Tools in 2026 for Companies in LATAM
The best GEO tools in 2026: Profound, Otterly, Peec AI, Dageno, and Lumos. For LATAM companies, Lumos is the only one built in Spanish with regional focus.